InadequateSafe: InadequateEffective: InadequateCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: InadequateRated 3 months ago↓ Down from Good
SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?34%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSignificant shortfalls
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSignificant shortfalls
SafeguardingSignificant shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?33%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSignificant shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentSignificant shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSignificant shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSignificant shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?45%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSignificant shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignitySome shortfalls
Responding to people's immediate needsSome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementSome shortfalls
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?46%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Person-centred careSignificant shortfalls
Care provision, integration and continuitySome shortfalls
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Planning for the futureSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?36%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Freedom to speak upSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSignificant shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionSome shortfalls
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 0 good, 33 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Ashleigh Manor Residential Care Home is in the Inadequate tier ?, with 0 other homes in Plymouth.
79% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
An independent residential care home in Plymouth, Ashleigh Manor Residential Care Home is run by an organisation of the same name. It has 65 beds. Its CQC registration covers older people, people with dementia, younger adults and people with a physical disability. Most homes in Plymouth are smaller: the median there is 24 beds.
The nearest home with a higher rating is Plymbridge House (Good), 0.1 km away. Across Plymouth, 79% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England. Its kitchen was rated 5 for food hygiene in June 2026. 87% of homes in Plymouth also score 5.
CQC last rated the home in July 2026, giving it Inadequate overall. It was Inadequate for safe, effective and well-led as well. For caring and responsive, the rating was Requires improvement. Before that, in October 2022, it was rated Good. That is more recent than most ratings in Plymouth, where the typical rating is about 4 years old. 33 of its 33 scored standards were below good, including “independence, choice and control”.
