SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?28%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSignificant shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Learning cultureSignificant shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSignificant shortfalls
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSignificant shortfalls
SafeguardingSignificant shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?33%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSignificant shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSignificant shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSignificant shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSignificant shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentSome shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSome shortfalls
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?30%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSignificant shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignitySignificant shortfalls
Responding to people's immediate needsSignificant shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementSignificant shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?43%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 7 below good
Care provision, integration and continuitySignificant shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSignificant shortfalls
Person-centred careSignificant shortfalls
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Planning for the futureGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?36%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSignificant shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionSome shortfalls
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 1 good, 32 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Ashley Court Care Limited is in the Inadequate tier ?, with 0 other homes in Wolverhampton.
67% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Ashley Court Care Limited is a 41-bed residential care home in Wolverhampton. The home is its own registered provider. It is registered to care for older people, people with dementia and younger adults. The typical home in Wolverhampton has 25 beds, so this one is bigger than average.
The current CQC rating is Inadequate, published in October 2026. Safe, effective, caring and well-led were also Inadequate. CQC rated responsive as Requires improvement. Its previous rating, in April 2020, was Good, so the home has slipped. The typical rating in Wolverhampton is about 2 years old, so this one is fairly recent. CQC found significant shortfalls in “independence, choice and control”, one of 32 standards out of 33 scored below good.
It is the only home in Wolverhampton in the “Inadequate” tier. Food hygiene inspectors scored the kitchen 5 out of 5 in July 2026. That is true of 89% of homes in Wolverhampton. Mountfield House Care Home, 0.2 km away, is the closest home rated Good.
