Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvementRated 5 months ago↓ Down from Good
SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?56%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSignificant shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
Learning cultureGood
Medicines optimisationGood
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
SafeguardingGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 6 good
Assessing needsGood
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?65%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?71%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 7 below good
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?61%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 7 below good
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upGood
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Shared direction and cultureGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 23 good, 10 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Ashton Manor Nursing Home is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 63 other homes in Surrey.
81% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Ashton Manor Nursing Home is one of 349 care homes in Surrey: a 39-bed nursing home in Farnham, run by Ashton Manor Care Home Ltd. CQC registers it to look after older people and people with dementia.
The kitchen has a food hygiene rating of 3 (generally satisfactory), from May 2026. In Surrey, 87% of homes score 5. In Surrey, 81% of rated care homes are Good or Outstanding (England 82%). About 0.8 km away, Dimensions 1 Middlefield Close is rated Good.
The current CQC rating is Requires improvement, published in May 2026. It was Requires improvement for safe and well-led as well. For effective, caring and responsive, the rating was Good. Before that, in October 2018, it was rated Good. The typical rating in Surrey is about 4 years old, so this one is fairly recent. Of the 33 standards CQC scored, 10 fell below good. The lowest was “infection prevention and control” (significant shortfalls).
