SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?38%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSignificant shortfalls
Learning cultureSignificant shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSignificant shortfalls
SafeguardingSignificant shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?46%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSignificant shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentSome shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSome shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 5 below good
Responding to people's immediate needsSignificant shortfalls
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignitySome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Care provision, integration and continuitySome shortfalls
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Planning for the futureSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?43%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSignificant shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 3 good, 30 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Beech Hill Grange is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 54 other homes in Birmingham.
77% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Beech Hill Grange is an independent 74-bed nursing home in Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, registered with CQC under its own name. CQC registers it to look after older people, people with dementia, younger adults and people with a physical disability. That is larger than most homes in Birmingham, where the typical home has 16 beds.
The current CQC rating is Requires improvement, published in June 2026. Effective, caring, responsive and well-led were also Requires improvement. Safe was rated Inadequate. Before that, in June 2022, it was rated Good. That is more recent than most ratings in Birmingham, where the typical rating is about 7 years old. 30 of its 33 scored standards were below good, including “responding to people's immediate needs”.
About 0.6 km away, Green Lanes is rated Good. Across Birmingham, 77% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England. Its kitchen was rated 5 for food hygiene in October 2025. That is true of 86% of homes in Birmingham.
