InadequateSafe: InadequateEffective: not ratedCaring: not ratedResponsive: not ratedWell-led: InadequateRated 1 month ago↓ Down from GoodNo registered manager
SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?31%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSignificant shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Learning cultureSignificant shortfalls
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSignificant shortfalls
SafeguardingSignificant shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?0%Not yet rated
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 6 good
Assessing needsGood
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?0%Not yet rated
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 5 good
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?0%Not yet rated
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 7 good
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?36%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSignificant shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionSome shortfalls
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 18 good, 15 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
An independent residential care home in Leamington Spa, Warwickshire, Burgess Care is run by an organisation of the same name. It has 20 beds. CQC registers it to look after older people, younger adults and people with a learning disability or autism.
Ashley House, 2.5 km away, is the closest home rated Good. There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now. Its kitchen was rated 3 for food hygiene in February 2026. In Warwickshire, 95% of homes score 5. In Warwickshire, 80% of rated care homes are Good or Outstanding (England 82%).
CQC rated it Inadequate overall and in all five key questions in September 2026. Before that, in April 2022, it was rated Good. The typical rating in Warwickshire is about 3 years old, so this one is fairly recent. CQC found significant shortfalls in “infection prevention and control”, one of 15 standards out of 33 scored below good.
