Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvementRated this month↓ Down from GoodNo registered managerNew owner since November 2023
SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?59%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 8 below good
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlGood
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
SafeguardingGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?58%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?60%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 5 below good
Responding to people's immediate needsSome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementSome shortfalls
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?61%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 7 below good
Care provision, integration and continuitySome shortfalls
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Equity in accessGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Planning for the futureGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 7 below good
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 11 good, 22 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Cedar Court Care Home is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 6 other homes in Bexley.
75% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Cedar Court Care Home is one of 28 care homes in Bexley: a 47-bed residential care home in London, run by MKR Healthcare Ltd. CQC registers it to look after older people, people with dementia, younger adults, people with a physical disability and people with mental health needs.
Its kitchen was rated 5 for food hygiene in April 2026. 95% of homes in Bexley also score 5. Across Bexley, 75% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England. MKR Healthcare Ltd has run the home since November 2023, when it changed owner. The nearest home with a higher rating is Weybourne (Good), 0.8 km away. There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now.
CQC rated it Requires improvement overall and in all five key questions in October 2026. That is down from Good in January 2018. That is more recent than most ratings in Bexley, where the typical rating is about 4 years old. CQC found significant shortfalls in “governance, management and sustainability”, one of 22 standards out of 33 scored below good.
