SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?63%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?60%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?64%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 7 below good
Care provision, integration and continuitySome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?36%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionSome shortfalls
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 9 good, 24 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
CM Kare Ltd runs Compton Manor, a residential care home in Coventry with room for 38 residents. Its CQC registration covers older people, people with dementia, younger adults, people with a physical disability and people with a sensory impairment.
CQC last rated the home in May 2026, giving it Requires improvement overall. Safe and caring were also Requires improvement. CQC rated effective and responsive as Good. CQC rated well-led as Inadequate. Its previous rating, in May 2023, was Good, so the home has slipped. The typical rating in Coventry is about 4 years old, so this one is fairly recent. Of the 33 standards CQC scored, 24 fell below good. The lowest was “capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders” (significant shortfalls).
The nearest home with a higher rating is Brookfield (Good), 0.4 km away. 23 other homes in Coventry share its tier, “Requires improvement”. The kitchen has a food hygiene rating of 5 (very good), from February 2026. That is true of 98% of homes in Coventry. CQC's register shows no registered manager at the moment.
