SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?63%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 8 below good
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlGood
Safe and effective staffingGood
Safe environmentsGood
SafeguardingGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?67%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?90%★Outstanding
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 5 exceptional
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
Independence, choice and controlExceptional
Kindness, compassion and dignityExceptional
Treating people as individualsExceptional
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 7 good
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?68%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 7 below good
Governance, management and sustainabilitySome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersGood
Freedom to speak upGood
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Shared direction and cultureGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 22 good, 3 exceptional, 8 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Eden House is in the Good, with Outstanding areas tier ?, with 6 other homes in North Yorkshire.
86% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Eden House is one of 196 care homes in North Yorkshire: a 5-bed residential care home in Filey, run by Mr Mark Anthony Cusick. It is registered to care for older people, younger adults and people with a learning disability or autism. The typical home in North Yorkshire has 29 beds, so this one is on the small side.
Of the 6 closest rated homes, none is rated above it. Across North Yorkshire, 86% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England. There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now.
CQC's latest rating, from March 2026, is Good overall. It was Good for safe, effective, responsive and well-led as well. For caring, the rating was Outstanding. It was also rated Good at the inspection before, in December 2018. The typical rating in North Yorkshire is about 5 years old, so this one is fairly recent. Of the 33 standards CQC scored, 8 fell below good. The lowest was “assessing needs” (some shortfalls).
