Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvementRated this month↓ Down from GoodNew owner since March 2025
SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?56%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 8 below good
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksGood
Medicines optimisationGood
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?71%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 6 below good
Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
Assessing needsGood
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?65%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?68%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 7 below good
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?57%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 7 below good
Freedom to speak upSome shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSome shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 18 good, 15 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Emmanuel House Care Home is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 28 other homes in East Riding of Yorkshire.
78% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Run by Emmanuel Care Home Ltd, Emmanuel House Care Home is a residential care home in Hessle, East Riding of Yorkshire with 44 registered beds. Its CQC registration covers older people, people with dementia and younger adults.
Emmanuel Care Home Ltd has run the home since March 2025, when it changed owner. The nearest home with a higher rating is Rosewood Lodge Residential Home (Good), 0.2 km away. Its kitchen was rated 5 for food hygiene in November 2025. 94% of homes in East Riding of Yorkshire also score 5. In East Riding of Yorkshire, 78% of rated care homes are Good or Outstanding (England 82%).
The current CQC rating is Requires improvement, published in October 2026. It was Requires improvement for safe and well-led as well. Effective, caring and responsive were rated Good. That is down from Good in December 2019. The typical rating in East Riding of Yorkshire is about 4 years old, so this one is fairly recent. CQC found significant shortfalls in “safe environments”, one of 15 standards out of 33 scored below good.
