SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?53%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 8 below good
Medicines optimisationSignificant shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlGood
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?71%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 6 below good
Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
Assessing needsGood
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?70%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?64%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 7 below good
Care provision, integration and continuitySome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?57%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 7 below good
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSome shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersGood
Freedom to speak upGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 18 good, 15 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Jah Jireh Maryport is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 15 other homes in Cumberland.
79% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Miss Joanna Hindmoor runs Jah Jireh Maryport, a residential care home in Maryport, Cumberland with room for 20 residents. It is registered to care for older people, people with dementia, people with a physical disability and people with a sensory impairment.
There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now. The kitchen has a food hygiene rating of 5 (very good), from June 2026. 90% of homes in Cumberland also score 5. 15 other homes in Cumberland share its tier, “Requires improvement”. About 0.0 km away, The Dales is rated Good.
CQC's latest rating, from July 2026, is Requires improvement overall. Safe and well-led were also Requires improvement. Effective, caring and responsive were rated Good. That is down from Good in January 2019. That is more recent than most ratings in Cumberland, where the typical rating is about 4 years old. CQC found significant shortfalls in “medicines optimisation”, one of 15 standards out of 33 scored below good.
