SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?59%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 8 below good
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlGood
Medicines optimisationGood
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?62%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?70%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 7 good
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?61%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSome shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySome shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationGood
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 20 good, 13 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Manor Field is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 19 other homes in North Northamptonshire.
80% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Manor Field is a 5-bed residential care home in Corby, North Northamptonshire, run by Parkcare Homes (No.2) Limited. It is registered to care for older people, younger adults, people with a learning disability or autism, people with mental health needs and children. The typical home in North Northamptonshire has 24 beds, so this one is on the small side.
The nearest home with a higher rating is Priors Hall Care Home (Good), 1.1 km away. It is one of 88 homes run by Parkcare Homes (No.2) Limited. 75 of those with a rating are Good or Outstanding. There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now. Across North Northamptonshire, 80% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England.
CQC's latest rating, from December 2024, is Requires improvement overall. Safe and well-led were also Requires improvement. For effective, caring and responsive, the rating was Good. Its previous rating, in January 2020, was Good, so the home has slipped. Ratings in North Northamptonshire are typically about 4 years old, which makes this one newer than most. CQC found some shortfalls in “independence, choice and control”, one of 13 standards out of 33 scored below good.
