SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?34%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSignificant shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Learning cultureSignificant shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSignificant shortfalls
SafeguardingSignificant shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?33%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSignificant shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSignificant shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSignificant shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSignificant shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentSome shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?45%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 5 below good
Responding to people's immediate needsSignificant shortfalls
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignitySome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementSome shortfalls
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?46%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Person-centred careSignificant shortfalls
Care provision, integration and continuitySome shortfalls
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Planning for the futureSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?39%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSignificant shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSome shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionSome shortfalls
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 0 good, 33 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Prema Court is one of 53 care homes in Trafford: a 44-bed nursing home in Manchester, run by Deepdene Care Limited. Its CQC registration covers people with mental health needs. The typical home in Trafford has 24 beds, so this one is bigger than average.
Its kitchen was rated 2 for food hygiene in April 2025. In Trafford, 95% of homes score 5. It is the only home in Trafford in the “Inadequate” tier. There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now. About 0.7 km away, Abbotsford Care Home - Manchester is rated Good. Deepdene Care Limited runs 3 care homes, and 1 of the 3 rated are Good or Outstanding.
CQC's latest rating, from July 2026, is Inadequate overall. It was Inadequate for safe and effective as well. For caring, responsive and well-led, the rating was Requires improvement. Its previous rating, in April 2021, was Good, so the home has slipped. That is more recent than most ratings in Trafford, where the typical rating is about 3 years old. Of the 33 standards CQC scored, 33 fell below good. The lowest was “responding to people's immediate needs” (significant shortfalls).