Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: Requires improvementResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvementRated 1 year ago↓ Down from Good
SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?44%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 8 below good
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSignificant shortfalls
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?58%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSignificant shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentSignificant shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?55%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignitySome shortfalls
Responding to people's immediate needsSome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 7 good
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?46%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 14 good, 19 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Seymour House is one of 15 care homes in Slough: a 6-bed residential care home in Slough, run by Committed Care Services Limited. Its CQC registration covers older people and people with a learning disability or autism. That is smaller than most homes in Slough, where the typical home has 16 beds.
About 0.7 km away, Windsor Care Centre is rated Good. Food hygiene inspectors scored the kitchen 4 out of 5 in April 2025. In Slough, 75% of homes score 5. 5 other homes in Slough share its tier, “Requires improvement”.
The current CQC rating is Requires improvement, published in August 2025. It was Requires improvement for safe, effective, caring and well-led as well. Responsive was rated Good. That is down from Good in November 2020. Ratings in Slough are typically about 4 years old, which makes this one newer than most. CQC found significant shortfalls in “assessing needs”, one of 19 standards out of 33 scored below good.
