SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?47%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?0%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?0%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 5 good
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?0%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 7 good
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?36%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSignificant shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 18 good, 15 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
South Collingham Hall is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 36 other homes in Nottinghamshire.
85% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
South Collingham Hall is one of 274 care homes in Nottinghamshire: a 33-bed residential care home in Newark, run by Broadoak Group of Care Homes. It is registered to care for older people, people with dementia, people with a physical disability and people with mental health needs.
The current CQC rating is Requires improvement, published in July 2026. It was Requires improvement for safe as well. For effective, caring and responsive, the rating was Good. Well-led was rated Inadequate. That is down from Good in December 2019. That is more recent than most ratings in Nottinghamshire, where the typical rating is about 4 years old. Of the 33 standards CQC scored, 15 fell below good. The lowest was “safe environments” (significant shortfalls).
CQC's register shows no registered manager at the moment. It is one of 17 homes run by Broadoak Group of Care Homes. 9 of those with a rating are Good or Outstanding. The nearest home with a higher rating is Village Farm (Outstanding), 5.8 km away. In Nottinghamshire, 85% of rated care homes are Good or Outstanding (England 82%).
