SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?0%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?0%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSome shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?0%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 5 below good
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementSome shortfalls
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?0%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 7 below good
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Planning for the futureSome shortfalls
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Person-centred careGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?57%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSome shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upGood
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 12 good, 21 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Stansfield Hall Care Home is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 17 other homes in Rochdale.
65% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Rajanikanth Selvanandan runs Stansfield Hall Care Home, a residential care home in Littleborough, Rochdale with room for 22 residents. CQC registers it to look after older people.
The current CQC rating is Requires improvement, published in May 2026. Safe, effective and well-led were also Requires improvement. For caring and responsive, the rating was Good. Its previous rating, in December 2019, was Good, so the home has slipped. Ratings in Rochdale are typically about 4 years old, which makes this one newer than most. 21 of its 33 scored standards were below good, including “treating people as individuals”.
Across Rochdale, 65% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England. Its kitchen was rated 1 for food hygiene in September 2026. 60% of homes in Rochdale score the top mark of 5. The nearest home with a higher rating is Mona Cliffe Care Home (Good), 1.5 km away. CQC's register shows no registered manager at the moment. Rajanikanth Selvanandan runs 4 care homes, and 3 of the 4 rated are Good or Outstanding.
