SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?56%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
Learning cultureGood
SafeguardingGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?54%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSome shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?65%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?57%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 7 below good
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Planning for the futureSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?61%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSome shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Shared direction and cultureGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 11 good, 22 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Stone Gables Care Home is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 29 other homes in Leeds.
78% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Run by W & S Red Rose Healthcare Limited, Stone Gables Care Home is a residential care home in Leeds with 40 registered beds. CQC registers it to look after older people, people with dementia, people with a physical disability and people with a sensory impairment.
Food hygiene inspectors scored the kitchen 5 out of 5 in January 2026. 89% of homes in Leeds also score 5. Across Leeds, 78% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England. Owlett Hall, 0.7 km away, is the closest home rated Good. There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now. It is one of 2 homes run by W & S Red Rose Healthcare Limited. 1 of those with a rating are Good or Outstanding.
CQC's latest rating, from September 2025, is Requires improvement overall. It was Requires improvement for safe, effective, responsive and well-led as well. For caring, the rating was Good. It was also rated Requires improvement at the inspection before, in July 2023. The typical rating in Leeds is about 3 years old, so this one is fairly recent. Of the 33 standards CQC scored, 22 fell below good. The lowest was “independence, choice and control” (some shortfalls).
