SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?53%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 8 below good
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?54%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSome shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?55%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignitySome shortfalls
Responding to people's immediate needsSome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?57%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 7 below good
Care provision, integration and continuitySome shortfalls
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?46%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 7 good, 26 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Thanet Healthcare Limited runs Thanet House, a residential care home in London, Lambeth with room for 6 residents. Its CQC registration covers younger adults, people with a learning disability or autism and people with mental health needs.
The kitchen has a food hygiene rating of 5 (very good), from February 2026. 96% of homes in Lambeth also score 5. 7 other homes in Lambeth share its tier, “Requires improvement”. About 0.5 km away, Vosse Court is rated Good.
In June 2026, CQC gave it Requires improvement overall, and Requires improvement for each of the five key questions too. Its previous rating, in April 2022, was Good, so the home has slipped. That is more recent than most ratings in Lambeth, where the typical rating is about 4 years old. 26 of its 33 scored standards were below good, including “capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders”.
