SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?28%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSignificant shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Learning cultureSignificant shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSignificant shortfalls
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSignificant shortfalls
SafeguardingSignificant shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?38%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 6 below good
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSignificant shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSignificant shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSignificant shortfalls
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentSome shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?25%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSignificant shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignitySignificant shortfalls
Responding to people's immediate needsSignificant shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSignificant shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementSignificant shortfalls
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?32%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Care provision, integration and continuitySignificant shortfalls
Equity in experiences and outcomesSignificant shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSignificant shortfalls
Person-centred careSignificant shortfalls
Planning for the futureSignificant shortfalls
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?32%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSignificant shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionSome shortfalls
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 0 good, 33 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
The Flowers Care Home Limited is in the Inadequate tier ?, with 1 other home in Bradford.
77% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
The Flowers Care Home Limited is a 23-bed residential care home in Bradford. The home is its own registered provider. CQC registers it to look after older people, people with dementia and younger adults.
Beacon House, 0.6 km away, is the closest home rated Good. 1 other home in Bradford share its tier, “Inadequate”. There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now.
In March 2026, CQC gave it Inadequate overall, and Inadequate for each of the five key questions too. That is down from Requires improvement in August 2023. The typical rating in Bradford is about 3 years old, so this one is fairly recent. CQC found significant shortfalls in “independence, choice and control”, one of 33 standards out of 33 scored below good.
