SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?59%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 8 below good
Safe and effective staffingSignificant shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksGood
Safe environmentsGood
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
SafeguardingGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 6 good
Assessing needsGood
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 5 good
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 7 good
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?61%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 7 below good
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upGood
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Shared direction and cultureGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 26 good, 7 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Walsingham House is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 29 other homes in Warwickshire.
80% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Walsingham House is one of 165 care homes in Warwickshire: a 4-bed residential care home in Nuneaton, run by PAKS Trust. CQC registers it to look after older people, younger adults, people with a physical disability, people with a learning disability or autism, people with mental health needs and people with a sensory impairment. That is smaller than most homes in Warwickshire, where the typical home has 33 beds.
29 other homes in Warwickshire share its tier, “Requires improvement”. It is one of 4 homes run by PAKS Trust. 3 of those with a rating are Good or Outstanding. The nearest home with a higher rating is Lupin House (Good), 0.3 km away.
CQC's latest rating, from October 2025, is Requires improvement overall. It was Requires improvement for safe and well-led as well. Effective, caring and responsive were rated Good. That matches its previous rating, from March 2020. That is more recent than most ratings in Warwickshire, where the typical rating is about 3 years old. Of the 33 standards CQC scored, 7 fell below good. The lowest was “safe and effective staffing” (significant shortfalls).
