SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?62%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 8 below good
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlGood
Involving people to manage risksGood
Medicines optimisationGood
Safe environmentsGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 6 good
Assessing needsGood
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 5 good
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?62%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 7 below good
Care provision, integration and continuitySignificant shortfalls
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?71%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 7 below good
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersGood
Freedom to speak upGood
Governance, management and sustainabilityGood
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Shared direction and cultureGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 27 good, 6 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Run by Cima Care Consortium Ltd, 41 West Hill is a residential care home in Sutton In Ashfield, Nottinghamshire with 5 registered beds. Its CQC registration covers younger adults and people with a learning disability or autism. The typical home in Nottinghamshire has 26 beds, so this one is on the small side.
Its CQC rating, from July 2024, is Good across the board: overall and for every key question. Its previous rating, in January 2024, was Inadequate, so the home has improved. The typical rating in Nottinghamshire is about 4 years old, so this one is fairly recent. CQC found significant shortfalls in “care provision, integration and continuity”, one of 6 standards out of 33 scored below good.
2 of Cima Care Consortium Ltd’s 2 rated homes are Good or Outstanding (compare care home groups). None of the 6 nearest rated homes has a higher rating. CQC's register shows no registered manager at the moment. Across Nottinghamshire, 85% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England. Its kitchen was rated 5 for food hygiene in July 2023. That is true of 89% of homes in Nottinghamshire.
