SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?34%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSignificant shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Learning cultureSignificant shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSignificant shortfalls
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 6 good
Assessing needsGood
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?55%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignitySome shortfalls
Responding to people's immediate needsSome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?71%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 7 below good
Care provision, integration and continuitySome shortfalls
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?36%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSignificant shortfalls
Freedom to speak upSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionSome shortfalls
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 13 good, 20 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Breckside Park Residential Home is in the Inadequate tier ?, with 4 other homes in Liverpool.
67% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Breckside Park Residential Home is one of 85 care homes in Liverpool: a 33-bed residential care home in Liverpool, run by Mr & Mrs K Khistria. Its CQC registration covers older people.
CQC's latest rating, from November 2025, is Inadequate overall. It was Inadequate for safe and well-led as well. For effective and responsive, the rating was Good. Caring was rated Requires improvement. Before that, in January 2020, it was rated Requires improvement. That is more recent than most ratings in Liverpool, where the typical rating is about 2 years old. CQC found significant shortfalls in “infection prevention and control”, one of 20 standards out of 33 scored below good.
About 0.4 km away, Rockfield House is rated Requires improvement. Its kitchen was rated 4 for food hygiene in March 2026. 64% of homes in Liverpool score the top mark of 5. Across Liverpool, 67% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England.
