SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?72%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 8 below good
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlGood
Involving people to manage risksGood
Learning cultureGood
Safe and effective staffingGood
Safe environmentsGood
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
SafeguardingGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 6 good
Assessing needsGood
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 5 good
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?79%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 7 exceptional
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Listening to and involving peopleExceptional
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?79%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 7 exceptional
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersGood
Freedom to speak upGood
Governance, management and sustainabilityGood
Learning, improvement and innovationGood
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Shared direction and cultureGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionExceptional
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 30 good, 2 exceptional, 1 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Cedarwood Lodge (Active Prospects) is in the Good tier ?, with 219 other homes in Surrey.
81% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
What the data says about Cedarwood Lodge (Active Prospects)
An independent residential care home in Redhill, Surrey, Cedarwood Lodge (Active Prospects) is run by an organisation of the same name. It has 5 beds. Its CQC registration covers older people, younger adults, people with a physical disability and people with a learning disability or autism. It is a small home for Surrey, where the median is 30 beds.
In December 2025, CQC gave it Good overall, and Good for each of the five key questions too. Its rating before that, in March 2018, was the same. That is more recent than most ratings in Surrey, where the typical rating is about 4 years old. CQC found some shortfalls in “medicines optimisation”, one of 1 standards out of 33 scored below good.
Across Surrey, 81% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England. The nearest home with a higher rating is Holkham House (Outstanding), 0.6 km away. 5 of Active Prospects’s 5 rated homes are Good or Outstanding (compare care home groups).
