SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?38%Inadequate
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSignificant shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSignificant shortfalls
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?54%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 6 below good
Monitoring and improving outcomesSignificant shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentSome shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
Assessing needsGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?55%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 5 below good
Independence, choice and controlSome shortfalls
Kindness, compassion and dignitySome shortfalls
Responding to people's immediate needsSome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?61%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 7 below good
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Planning for the futureGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 7 below good
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSignificant shortfalls
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSignificant shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upGood
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 9 good, 24 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Healey Lodge Residential Home is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 65 other homes in Lancashire.
83% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
What the data says about Healey Lodge Residential Home
Healey Lodge Residential Home is a 24-bed residential care home in Burnley, Lancashire, run by Silverdale Care Homes Limited. CQC registers it to look after older people, people with dementia, younger adults and people with a learning disability or autism.
CQC last rated the home in January 2026, giving it Requires improvement overall. Effective, caring, responsive and well-led were also Requires improvement. CQC rated safe as Inadequate. That matches its previous rating, from January 2023. That is more recent than most ratings in Lancashire, where the typical rating is about 5 years old. CQC found significant shortfalls in “monitoring and improving outcomes”, one of 24 standards out of 33 scored below good.
65 other homes in Lancashire share its tier, “Requires improvement”. Food hygiene inspectors scored the kitchen 4 out of 5 in January 2026. 77% of homes in Lancashire score the top mark of 5. CQC's register shows no registered manager at the moment. 0 of Silverdale Care Homes Limited’s 2 rated homes are Good or Outstanding (compare care home groups). About 0.1 km away, Acorn Heights Care Home is rated Good.
