SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 8 below good
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?63%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 6 below good
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?70%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 5 below good
Workforce wellbeing and enablementSome shortfalls
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?68%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 7 below good
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?62%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 7 below good
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersGood
Freedom to speak upGood
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Shared direction and cultureGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 18 good, 15 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Te Hira Care Home Limited is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 29 other homes in Warwickshire.
80% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Te Hira Care Home Limited is an independent 14-bed residential care home in Rugby, Warwickshire, registered with CQC under its own name. Its CQC registration covers older people and people with dementia. It is a small home for Warwickshire, where the median is 33 beds.
Food hygiene inspectors scored the kitchen 5 out of 5 in December 2025. 95% of homes in Warwickshire also score 5. In Warwickshire, 80% of rated care homes are Good or Outstanding (England 82%). There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now. About 0.2 km away, Rugby Care Centre is rated Good.
CQC last rated the home in September 2026, giving it Requires improvement overall. It was Requires improvement for safe and well-led as well. Effective, caring and responsive were rated Good. That is down from Good in September 2018. That is more recent than most ratings in Warwickshire, where the typical rating is about 3 years old. CQC found significant shortfalls in “safe environments”, one of 15 standards out of 33 scored below good.
