SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown7 of 8 below good
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
Learning cultureGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 6 below good
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSignificant shortfalls
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Consent to care and treatmentSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?65%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 5 below good
Kindness, compassion and dignitySome shortfalls
Responding to people's immediate needsSome shortfalls
Independence, choice and controlGood
Treating people as individualsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?64%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 7 below good
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?61%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 7 below good
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersGood
Freedom to speak upGood
Shared direction and cultureGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 13 good, 20 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
The Cedar Grange Nursing Home is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 19 other homes in Wolverhampton.
67% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
The Cedar Grange Nursing Home is one of 70 care homes in Wolverhampton: a 59-bed nursing home in Wolverhampton, run by Proud Care Homes Ltd. It is registered to care for older people, people with dementia and younger adults. That is larger than most homes in Wolverhampton, where the typical home has 25 beds.
Proud Care Homes Ltd has run the home since November 2023, when it changed owner. About 1.4 km away, Welbeck House is rated Good. There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now. Food hygiene inspectors scored the kitchen 5 out of 5 in May 2026. 89% of homes in Wolverhampton also score 5. In Wolverhampton, 67% of rated care homes are Good or Outstanding (England 82%).
The current CQC rating is Requires improvement, published in May 2025. It was Requires improvement for safe, effective and well-led as well. For caring and responsive, the rating was Good. It was also rated Requires improvement at the inspection before, in January 2023. Ratings in Wolverhampton are typically about 2 years old, which makes this one newer than most. CQC found significant shortfalls in “delivering evidence-based care and treatment”, one of 20 standards out of 33 scored below good.
