Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Requires improvementRated 1 year ago↓ Down from Good
SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 8 below good
Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
Safe environmentsSignificant shortfalls
SafeguardingSignificant shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Infection prevention and controlGood
Learning cultureGood
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 6 good
Assessing needsGood
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 5 good
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 7 good
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Equity in accessGood
Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
Listening to and involving peopleGood
Person-centred careGood
Planning for the futureGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?57%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 7 below good
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upGood
Shared direction and cultureGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 24 good, 9 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Cann House Care Home is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 16 other homes in Plymouth.
79% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Cann House Care Home is a 62-bed nursing home in Plymouth, run by Premiere Health Limited. Its CQC registration covers older people and people with a physical disability. Most homes in Plymouth are smaller: the median there is 24 beds.
About 1.1 km away, Kazdin is rated Good. 16 other homes in Plymouth share its tier, “Requires improvement”.
The current CQC rating is Requires improvement, published in April 2025. Safe and well-led were also Requires improvement. CQC rated effective, caring and responsive as Good. Before that, in November 2022, it was rated Good. Ratings in Plymouth are typically about 4 years old, which makes this one newer than most. Of the 33 standards CQC scored, 9 fell below good. The lowest was “involving people to manage risks” (significant shortfalls).
