SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?66%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown3 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
Learning cultureGood
Medicines optimisationGood
Safe and effective staffingGood
Safe environmentsGood
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 6 good
Assessing needsGood
Consent to care and treatmentGood
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?75%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 5 good
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Responding to people's immediate needsGood
Treating people as individualsGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?57%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 7 below good
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Planning for the futureSome shortfalls
Care provision, integration and continuityGood
Providing InformationGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?71%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 7 below good
Governance, management and sustainabilitySome shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersGood
Freedom to speak upGood
Learning, improvement and innovationGood
Partnerships and communitiesGood
Shared direction and cultureGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 24 good, 9 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
CQC's register shows no registered manager for this home. Every care home must have one. The home may be recruiting, or a new manager may be applying to CQC. ?
Moundsley House is in the Good, with an area to improve tier ?, with 16 other homes in Worcestershire.
85% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
Moundsley House is a 60-bed nursing home in Birmingham, Worcestershire, run by Moundsley Hall Limited. CQC registers it to look after older people, people with dementia, younger adults, people with a physical disability and people with mental health needs. The typical home in Worcestershire has 35 beds, so this one is bigger than average.
There is no registered manager on CQC's register right now. Of the 6 closest rated homes, none is rated above it. 3 of Moundsley Hall Limited’s 3 rated homes are Good or Outstanding (compare care home groups). The kitchen has a food hygiene rating of 4 (good), from September 2026. In Worcestershire, 92% of homes score 5. Across Worcestershire, 85% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England.
The current CQC rating is Good, published in September 2024. Safe, effective, caring and well-led were also Good. For responsive, the rating was Requires improvement. It was also rated Good at the inspection before, in April 2022. That is more recent than most ratings in Worcestershire, where the typical rating is about 4 years old. CQC found some shortfalls in “equity in access”, one of 9 standards out of 33 scored below good.
