Requires improvementSafe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvementRated this month↓ Down from Good
SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown8 of 8 below good
Infection prevention and controlSome shortfalls
Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
Learning cultureSome shortfalls
Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
Safe and effective staffingSome shortfalls
Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
Safe systems, pathways and transitionsSome shortfalls
SafeguardingSome shortfalls
EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?46%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 6 below good
Consent to care and treatmentSignificant shortfalls
Assessing needsSome shortfalls
Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSome shortfalls
How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?65%Good
See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 5 below good
Responding to people's immediate needsSome shortfalls
Treating people as individualsSome shortfalls
Independence, choice and controlGood
Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?54%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown6 of 7 below good
Care provision, integration and continuitySome shortfalls
Equity in accessSome shortfalls
Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
Listening to and involving peopleSome shortfalls
Person-centred careSome shortfalls
Providing InformationSome shortfalls
Planning for the futureGood
Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?50%Requires improvement
See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 7 below good
Governance, management and sustainabilitySignificant shortfalls
Shared direction and cultureSignificant shortfalls
Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSome shortfalls
Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
Partnerships and communitiesSome shortfalls
Freedom to speak upGood
Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood
Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?
CQC scored 33 standards: 6 good, 27 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?
CQC hasn't inspected this home for more than 5 years. It re-inspects based on risk, so an old rating doesn't count against a home on this site, but it may not reflect the home today. ?
Newton Hall Residential Home is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 19 other homes in Cheshire West and Chester.
72% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).
What the data says about Newton Hall Residential Home
Newton Hall Residential Home is a 34-bed residential care home in Frodsham, Cheshire West and Chester, run by Kingsview Homes Limited. CQC registers it to look after older people and people with dementia.
CQC last rated the home in October 2026, giving it Requires improvement overall. Safe, effective, responsive and well-led were also Requires improvement. CQC rated caring as Good. That is down from Good in March 2019. That is more recent than most ratings in Cheshire West and Chester, where the typical rating is about 4 years old. 27 of its 33 scored standards were below good, including “consent to care and treatment”.
The kitchen has a food hygiene rating of 5 (very good), from September 2025. That is true of 89% of homes in Cheshire West and Chester. Across Cheshire West and Chester, 72% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England. About 1.2 km away, Hillcrest Residential Care Home is rated Good.
