Residential care home · Surrey

Shottermill House

Liphook Road, Haslemere, GU27 1NX

Good Safe: GoodEffective: GoodCaring: GoodResponsive: GoodWell-led: Good Rated 1 year ago

CQC rating

Good
Published 30 September 2025 Rated 1 year ago ?
  • SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?69%Good
    See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 8 below good
    • Involving people to manage risksSome shortfalls
    • Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
    • Infection prevention and controlGood
    • Learning cultureGood
    • Safe and effective staffingGood
    • Safe environmentsGood
    • Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
    • SafeguardingGood
  • EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?75%Good
    See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 6 good
    • Assessing needsGood
    • Consent to care and treatmentGood
    • Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentGood
    • How staff, teams and services work togetherGood
    • Monitoring and improving outcomesGood
    • Supporting people to live healthier livesGood
  • CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?85%Good
    See the breakdownHide the breakdown2 of 5 exceptional
    • Independence, choice and controlGood
    • Responding to people's immediate needsGood
    • Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
    • Kindness, compassion and dignityExceptional
    • Treating people as individualsExceptional
  • ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?75%Good
    See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 7 good
    • Care provision, integration and continuityGood
    • Equity in accessGood
    • Equity in experiences and outcomesGood
    • Listening to and involving peopleGood
    • Person-centred careGood
    • Planning for the futureGood
    • Providing InformationGood
  • Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?71%Good
    See the breakdownHide the breakdown1 of 7 below good
    • Governance, management and sustainabilitySome shortfalls
    • Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersGood
    • Freedom to speak upGood
    • Learning, improvement and innovationGood
    • Partnerships and communitiesGood
    • Shared direction and cultureGood
    • Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood

Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?

CQC scored 33 standards: 28 good, 2 exceptional, 3 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?

Earlier ratings ?

  • August 2020Inspected, no new rating
  • November 2019GoodSECRW
  • June 2017GoodSECRW

The home changed owner or registration. Earlier ratings are on the CQC website: previous registration ↗.

Read the full report on the CQC website ↗

How it compares in Surrey

Shottermill House is in the Good tier ?, with 219 other homes in Surrey. 81% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).

  • Outstanding 15 (4%)
  • Good, with Outstanding areas 15 (4%)
  • Good 220 (63%)
  • Good, with an area to improve 22 (6%)
  • Requires improvement 64 (18%)
  • Inadequate 1 (0%)
  • Not yet rated 12 (3%)

See all 349 care homes in Surrey →

Care homes nearby

  • Chestnut View Care Centre
    Haslemere, Surrey · GU27 1LD · Nursing home · 60 beds0.5 km
    Requires improvement S: Requires improvementE: Requires improvementC: Requires improvementR: Requires improvementW: Inadequate Rated 2 years ago
  • Brownscombe Residency
    Haslemere, Surrey · GU27 3PL · Nursing home · 55 beds0.9 km
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 3 years ago
  • Haven House
    Haslemere, Surrey · GU27 2QG · Residential care home · 9 beds0.9 km
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 7 years ago
  • St Magnus Hospital and St Magnus Nursing
    Haslemere, West Sussex · GU27 3PX · Nursing home · 91 beds1.8 km
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 2 years ago
  • Weyspring Park
    Haslemere, West Sussex · GU27 3DJ · Nursing home · 34 beds1.9 km
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 3 years ago
  • Beechwood
    Hindhead, Surrey · GU26 6GG · Residential care home · 5 beds1.9 km
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 3 years ago

More care homes near GU27 1NX →

Other homes run by Pilgrims' Friend Society

12 care homes in total: 10 Good, 2 Requires improvement.

  • Evington Home - Pilgrims' Friend Society
    Leicester · LE5 6AL · Residential care home · 30 beds
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: OutstandingR: GoodW: Good Rated 8 months ago
  • Finborough Court
    Stowmarket, Suffolk · IP14 3AY · Residential care home · 32 beds
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: OutstandingR: GoodW: Good Rated 4 months ago
  • Emmaus House
    Harrogate, North Yorkshire · HG2 0JS · Residential care home · 23 beds
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 2 months ago
  • Ernest Luff Homes
    Walton On The Naze, Essex · CO14 8SW · Residential care home · 28 beds
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 7 years ago
  • Framland
    Wantage, Oxfordshire · OX12 9DL · Residential care home · 23 beds
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 8 years ago
  • Furze Hill House
    North Walsham, Norfolk · NR28 9HD · Residential care home · 40 beds
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 8 years ago

All 12 homes run by Pilgrims' Friend Society →

About Shottermill House

Shottermill House is a 31-bed residential care home in Haslemere, Surrey, run by Pilgrims' Friend Society. CQC registers it to look after older people, people with dementia and people with a physical disability.

Of the 6 closest rated homes, none is rated above it. Pilgrims' Friend Society runs 12 care homes, and 10 of the 12 rated are Good or Outstanding. The kitchen has a food hygiene rating of 5 (very good), from April 2025. 87% of homes in Surrey also score 5. Across Surrey, 81% of rated homes are Good or Outstanding, against 82% for England.

In September 2025, CQC gave it Good overall, and Good for each of the five key questions too. That matches its previous rating, from November 2019. The typical rating in Surrey is about 4 years old, so this one is fairly recent. CQC found some shortfalls in “involving people to manage risks”, one of 3 standards out of 33 scored below good.