Residential care home · Walsall

Ash House

161 Aston Road, Willenhall, WV13 3BY

Requires improvement Safe: Requires improvementEffective: Requires improvementCaring: GoodResponsive: Requires improvementWell-led: Requires improvement Rated 4 months ago

CQC rating

Requires improvement
Published 18 June 2026 Rated 4 months ago ?
  • SafeAre people protected from abuse and avoidable harm?56%Requires improvement
    See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 8 below good
    • Involving people to manage risksSignificant shortfalls
    • Learning cultureSome shortfalls
    • Medicines optimisationSome shortfalls
    • Safe environmentsSome shortfalls
    • SafeguardingSome shortfalls
    • Infection prevention and controlGood
    • Safe and effective staffingGood
    • Safe systems, pathways and transitionsGood
  • EffectiveDoes care achieve good outcomes and a good quality of life?54%Requires improvement
    See the breakdownHide the breakdown5 of 6 below good
    • Assessing needsSome shortfalls
    • Delivering evidence-based care and treatmentSome shortfalls
    • How staff, teams and services work togetherSome shortfalls
    • Monitoring and improving outcomesSome shortfalls
    • Supporting people to live healthier livesSome shortfalls
    • Consent to care and treatmentGood
  • CaringAre staff kind, compassionate and respectful?75%Good
    See the breakdownHide the breakdownAll 5 good
    • Independence, choice and controlGood
    • Kindness, compassion and dignityGood
    • Responding to people's immediate needsGood
    • Treating people as individualsGood
    • Workforce wellbeing and enablementGood
  • ResponsiveAre services organised to meet people's needs?61%Requires improvement
    See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 7 below good
    • Care provision, integration and continuitySome shortfalls
    • Equity in accessSome shortfalls
    • Equity in experiences and outcomesSome shortfalls
    • Person-centred careSome shortfalls
    • Listening to and involving peopleGood
    • Planning for the futureGood
    • Providing InformationGood
  • Well-ledIs the home well managed, with a culture of high-quality care?61%Requires improvement
    See the breakdownHide the breakdown4 of 7 below good
    • Capable, compassionate and inclusive leadersSome shortfalls
    • Governance, management and sustainabilitySome shortfalls
    • Learning, improvement and innovationSome shortfalls
    • Shared direction and cultureSome shortfalls
    • Freedom to speak upGood
    • Partnerships and communitiesGood
    • Workforce equality, diversity and inclusionGood

Percentages are CQC scores from its newer way of assessing homes. ?

CQC scored 33 standards: 15 good, 18 below good. Use “See the breakdown” on each key question for its standards. ?

Read the full report on the CQC website ↗

How it compares in Walsall

Ash House is in the Requires improvement tier ?, with 17 other homes in Walsall. 67% of rated homes here are Good or Outstanding (England: 82%).

  • Outstanding 2 (3%)
  • Good 27 (44%)
  • Good, with an area to improve 10 (16%)
  • Requires improvement 18 (29%)
  • Inadequate 1 (2%)
  • Not yet rated 4 (6%)

See all 62 care homes in Walsall →

Care homes nearby

  • Woodthorne Care Home
    Willenhall, Walsall · WV13 1SY · Residential care home · 21 beds0.8 km
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Requires improvement Rated 5 years ago
  • Manor House Residential Home
    Willenhall, Walsall · WV13 2EH · Residential care home · 30 beds1.6 km
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 3 years ago
  • Ebenezer House
    Willenhall, Walsall · WV13 2LJ · Residential care home · 5 beds1.7 km
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Requires improvement Rated 4 years ago
  • Kingsway Care Home
    Willenhall, Walsall · WV13 2LJ · Residential care home · 11 beds1.7 km
    Requires improvement S: Requires improvementE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Requires improvement Rated 3 years ago
  • Duke Street Bungalows
    Wolverhampton · WV11 1TH · Residential care home · 16 beds1.8 km
    Requires improvement S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: Requires improvementW: Requires improvement Rated 3 months ago
  • Selwyn Court
    Willenhall, Walsall · WV13 2QF · Residential care home · 37 beds1.9 km
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 3 years ago

More care homes near WV13 3BY →

Other homes run by Pharos Care Limited

6 care homes in total: 2 Good, 4 Requires improvement.

  • The Boat House
    Tamworth, Staffordshire · B78 3QN · Residential care home · 8 beds
    Good S: GoodE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 3 years ago
  • The Lodge
    Wednesbury, Sandwell · WS10 9RX · Residential care home · 8 beds
    Good S: Requires improvementE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Good Rated 4 months ago
  • Highfield House
    Walsall · WS3 4AD · Residential care home · 7 beds
    Requires improvement S: Requires improvementE: GoodC: Requires improvementR: GoodW: Requires improvement Rated 4 months ago
  • Katherine House
    Birmingham · B23 5XA · Residential care home · 9 beds
    Requires improvement S: Requires improvementE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Requires improvement Rated 3 years ago
  • Sutton House
    Birmingham · B23 5XA · Residential care home · 5 beds
    Requires improvement S: Requires improvementE: GoodC: GoodR: GoodW: Requires improvement Rated 3 years ago

All 6 homes run by Pharos Care Limited →

Ash House in brief

Run by Pharos Care Limited, Ash House is a residential care home in Willenhall, Walsall with 4 registered beds. It is registered to care for younger adults, people with a learning disability or autism and people with mental health needs. It is a small home for Walsall, where the median is 30 beds.

Pharos Care Limited runs 6 care homes, and 2 of the 6 rated are Good or Outstanding. The nearest home with a higher rating is Woodthorne Care Home (Good), 0.8 km away. 17 other homes in Walsall share its tier, “Requires improvement”.

CQC last rated the home in June 2026, giving it Requires improvement overall. It was Requires improvement for safe, effective, responsive and well-led as well. For caring, the rating was Good. Ratings in Walsall are typically about 3 years old, which makes this one newer than most. 18 of its 33 scored standards were below good, including “involving people to manage risks”.